Debates and Debates in Islamic Thought the Debates of Imam Sadiq (Peace be Upon him) Model

  • Fatima Hamza Kadim University of Baghdad / College of Islamic Sciences Department of the fundamentals of religion
Keywords: Debate, twine, Al- Imam Al- Sadiq

Abstract

Is a dialogue between two teams on a subject for each of the parallels point of view contrary to the point of view of his opponent, the goal of showing the truth was not a discussion of a written note taught at the beginning of Islam, where there was no need to study this science for the safety of instinct and the Arabic language then, but the proliferation of Islamic conquests and the spread of Islam overlap With the Arabic language Other languages ​​People needed rules to be bound by the discussion So blogging in this science became one of the most urgent needs and in order to defend religion and Sharia it became necessary to learn the arts of debate and debate was the first to distinguish these rules and make them independent science and classified the corner religion The scholars have proven that the study of this science is obligatory if it was done by some fell from the rest as we discussed in the course of the search for this science and ethics and special rules must be adhered to Almtazran away from the spasm and sectarianism and sectarianism because it is originally a collaboration between the two teams of symmetrical In order to find out the truth, these debates were repeated during the era of the faithful Imam Muhammad al-Baqir and Ja'far al-Sadiq (peace be upon them) despite their deep history, beginning with the era of the Messenger of Allah and the imams after him (peace be upon them) The truthful was the height of preaching During the reign of Imam Sadiq (peace be upon him), where he sat for the public and private, people from all countries came to him asking him about halal and haram and the interpretation of the Qur'aan, so no one came out of them except satisfied. Imam (peace be upon him) faced all the perverse currents and ideologies prevailing in his time Such as heresy, ignorance, isolation, algebra and opinion, and what results from these currents of misinterpretation of the Shariah, so he confronted them and discussed them in a number of ways, so that he deviated from their content in order to preserve the true religion and in order to learn from this great school and as a result of the importance of the science of debate and debate. Paul brothers, dear readers interest.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2018-11-15
How to Cite
[1]
F. Kadim, “Debates and Debates in Islamic Thought the Debates of Imam Sadiq (Peace be Upon him) Model”, JUBH, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1 - 18, Nov. 2018.
Section
Articles