The Legislative Regulation of Special Naturalization: A Comparative Study

Abstract

Most of the countries that decide on the principle of granting citizenship to individuals as an exception have an indirect purpose or a purpose corresponding to the granting of citizenship as an exception, and it is often represented by providing a private benefit or performing a public service, so this type of naturalization is based on a firm basis that the public benefit of the state is achieved. The grantor of citizenship, and in line with the need of that state, so it is not possible to imagine the possibility of granting state citizenship to every person who can provide those services just because of ability. Based on internal standards of the state, and this is considered part of the principle of state sovereignty and sovereignty; It has the right to decide the controls that require achieving the supreme interest of the state according to what it deems appropriate for it. It also has the right to reject an application for naturalization, despite the availability of controls in an individual in the event that it becomes clear to it that it is not commensurate with the requirements of the public interest; Because he is unable to achieve it in the required manner, i.e. in other words, that person is not suitable in any way so that it would be in violation of the instructions and standards of the state to which he wants to belong by way of special naturalization.